<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Probabilistic Inference | Haozhe Lei</title><link>https://panshark.github.io/tags/probabilistic-inference/</link><atom:link href="https://panshark.github.io/tags/probabilistic-inference/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Probabilistic Inference</description><generator>HugoBlox Kit (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>MC-CLE: Full-Posterior Wireless Localization</title><link>https://panshark.github.io/projects/mccle-full-posterior-localization/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://panshark.github.io/projects/mccle-full-posterior-localization/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I lead &lt;strong&gt;MC-CLE&lt;/strong&gt;, a probabilistic localization method that asks how compatible each candidate transmitter location is with a sparse angle-and-strength measurement. Instead of forcing ambiguous RF evidence into one coordinate, MC-CLE learns a spatial likelihood field that retains directional structure and multiple plausible hypotheses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="from-physical-measurement-to-spatial-likelihood"&gt;From physical measurement to spatial likelihood&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The model conditions candidate-wise scoring on receiver geometry and the measured channel signature. Normalizing the scores over candidate locations yields a full posterior that can be calibrated and fused across measurements.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class="project-figure-wide"&gt;
&lt;figure class="project-figure-card"&gt;
&lt;img src="mccle_flow.png" alt="MC-CLE workflow from a ray-traced scene, receiver pose geometry, and RF channel signature to a full spatial posterior." loading="lazy" decoding="async"&gt;
&lt;figcaption&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Journal schematic.&lt;/strong&gt; Scene geometry, receiver pose, and the RF channel signature condition a learned candidate scorer, producing a full spatial posterior rather than a single estimate.&lt;/figcaption&gt;
&lt;/figure&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="project-figure-wide project-figure-wide--results"&gt;
&lt;figure class="project-figure-card"&gt;
&lt;img src="mccle_conference_posteriors.png" alt="MC-CLE posterior fields compared with Cartesian and polar Gaussian baselines across transmitter-receiver geometries." loading="lazy" decoding="async"&gt;
&lt;figcaption&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conference evidence.&lt;/strong&gt; Across varied transmitter-receiver geometries, MC-CLE preserves directional and multimodal posterior structure that Gaussian point-error models smooth away or constrain incorrectly.&lt;/figcaption&gt;
&lt;/figure&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The peer-reviewed
introduces likelihood-based full-posterior localization. The first- and corresponding-author journal extension,
, is under review at &lt;strong&gt;IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology (TVT)&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="relationship-to-locus-dt"&gt;Relationship to LOCUS-DT&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;MC-CLE and
address the same full-posterior localization objective through complementary model classes. MC-CLE learns a measurement-conditioned candidate likelihood, while LOCUS-DT explicitly compares observations with ray-traced candidate signatures. Both provide calibrated spatial belief as an interface to downstream localization and autonomous sensing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>LOCUS-DT: Digital-Twin Posterior Localization</title><link>https://panshark.github.io/projects/locus-dt-digital-twin-localization/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://panshark.github.io/projects/locus-dt-digital-twin-localization/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I lead &lt;strong&gt;LOCUS-DT&lt;/strong&gt;, a wireless-localization framework that compares an observed multipath snapshot with candidate-specific signatures generated by a ray-tracing wireless digital twin. The learned compatibility scores form a posterior over transmitter location, including multiple plausible modes when the measurement is incomplete or the model is imperfect.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="observation-conditioned-digital-twin-inference"&gt;Observation-conditioned digital-twin inference&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For every candidate location, the digital twin supplies the multipath structure that the receiver would expect. LOCUS-DT scores the agreement between those simulated hypotheses and the measured path peaks, then normalizes the scores into a calibrated spatial belief.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class="project-figure-wide"&gt;
&lt;figure class="project-figure-card"&gt;
&lt;img src="locus_dt_overview.png" alt="LOCUS-DT framework connecting a real RF snapshot, a wireless-digital-twin candidate library, learned compatibility scoring, and the resulting location posterior." loading="lazy" decoding="async"&gt;
&lt;figcaption&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Journal schematic.&lt;/strong&gt; LOCUS-DT matches measured multipath features with candidate-specific ray-traced signatures and converts their learned compatibility into a transmitter-location posterior.&lt;/figcaption&gt;
&lt;/figure&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="project-figure-wide project-figure-wide--results"&gt;
&lt;figure class="project-figure-card"&gt;
&lt;img src="locus_dt_conference_posteriors.png" alt="LOCUS-DT posterior localization results in three unseen indoor layouts." loading="lazy" decoding="async"&gt;
&lt;figcaption&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conference evidence.&lt;/strong&gt; Experiments across three unseen indoor layouts recover structured, often multimodal posteriors that expose blockage and multipath instead of hiding them behind one coordinate.&lt;/figcaption&gt;
&lt;/figure&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The peer-reviewed
establishes LOCUS-DT. The first- and corresponding-author journal extension,
, studies site generalization and explicit digital-twin mismatch; a revision is in preparation for resubmission to &lt;strong&gt;IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications (TWC)&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="relationship-to-mc-cle"&gt;Relationship to MC-CLE&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LOCUS-DT and
share a full-posterior localization objective but use complementary models. LOCUS-DT explicitly evaluates observed multipath against ray-traced candidate signatures; MC-CLE learns a measurement-conditioned candidate likelihood. Their common output is calibrated spatial belief that can support localization, multi-view fusion, and active sensing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>MAGNETAR: Joint RF Pose Inference</title><link>https://panshark.github.io/projects/magnetar-joint-rf-pose-inference/</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://panshark.github.io/projects/magnetar-joint-rf-pose-inference/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I lead &lt;strong&gt;MAGNETAR&lt;/strong&gt; from probabilistic formulation and neural architecture design through real-to-sim calibration, MobiFR3 integration, experiment design, and evaluation. The method estimates a joint posterior over a transmitter&amp;rsquo;s planar position and heading from one asynchronous RF multipath snapshot, rather than forcing an ambiguous observation into a single pose estimate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class="project-video-shell"&gt;
&lt;video controls playsinline preload="metadata" poster="featured.png" aria-describedby="magnetar-video-description"&gt;
&lt;source src="magnetar-demo.mp4" type="video/mp4"&gt;
Your browser does not support embedded MP4 video.
&lt;/video&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p id="magnetar-video-description"&gt;&lt;em&gt;The three-minute overview shows why position and heading must be inferred together, how MAGNETAR scores pose hypotheses, and how it is evaluated with robotic measurements.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class="project-figure-grid" aria-label="MAGNETAR method and physical-system figures"&gt;
&lt;figure class="project-figure-card"&gt;
&lt;img src="magnetar-method.png" alt="MAGNETAR pipeline from a multipath RF observation and receiver pose to a joint posterior over transmitter position and heading." loading="lazy" decoding="async"&gt;
&lt;figcaption&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Joint pose inference.&lt;/strong&gt; A heading-conditioned spatial scorer preserves competing position and orientation hypotheses rather than collapsing an ambiguous RF snapshot into one estimate.&lt;/figcaption&gt;
&lt;/figure&gt;
&lt;figure class="project-figure-card"&gt;
&lt;img src="magnetar-system-fusion.png" alt="MobiFR3 robotic RF measurement system and fusion of position-heading posteriors collected from multiple receiver viewpoints." loading="lazy" decoding="async"&gt;
&lt;figcaption&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Physical validation and fusion.&lt;/strong&gt; MobiFR3 couples 10-GHz measurements with robot poses; evidence from multiple viewpoints is fused to resolve ambiguous transmitter poses.&lt;/figcaption&gt;
&lt;/figure&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;h2 id="method"&gt;Method&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Represents each observation by angle-of-arrival and signal-to-noise-ratio estimates, together with the known room layout and receiver pose.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Uses a heading-conditioned shared 2D U-Net to score and jointly normalize a discretized position-heading grid.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Trains primarily in real-to-sim-calibrated 10-GHz simulation, with measured antenna patterns and RF-chain/noise effects, then augments training with 1,800 measured records.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Fuses joint posteriors across observations so that evidence with incompatible heading hypotheses does not reinforce the wrong position.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;h2 id="physical-evaluation"&gt;Physical evaluation&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The experimental study uses
, the robotic RF system that I lead. On 24,000 held-out measurements, the heading-conditioned scorer achieved the lowest real-data negative log-likelihood and the highest joint hit rate among the tested models. Student collaborators whom I mentor contributed to RF operation and data acquisition; I led the algorithm, calibration, RF-robot integration, experimental design, and evaluation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Paper:&lt;/strong&gt;
— first and corresponding author; IEEE ICRA 2027, under review.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Beyond Point Estimates: Likelihood-Based Full-Posterior Wireless Localization</title><link>https://panshark.github.io/publications/lei2025-likelihoodposterior-rfloc/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://panshark.github.io/publications/lei2025-likelihoodposterior-rfloc/</guid><description>&lt;div class="author-role-note"&gt;
&lt;span&gt;First and corresponding author&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;MC-CLE scores candidate transmitter states rather than regressing directly to one coordinate. The resulting posterior retains spatial ambiguity created by blockage, antenna directivity, and multipath, and provides a probabilistic interface for multi-view fusion and downstream decisions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The continuing journal study,
, is under review at IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>